Laboratory and Bone Marrow Evaluation
in Patients With Cancer
Lynn C. Moscinski, MD
Anemia in patients with cancer has multiple causes. Since establishing a
diagnosis can be difficult, evaluation via laboratory findings and bone marrow
histopathology is often necessary. Cytopenias can result either directly or indirectly
from the malignancy, or they occasionally are the result of other causes, such as AIDS or
infection.
Introduction
Patients with cancer frequently have anemia, with or without other
associated cytopenias. Cancer-related anemia can be a direct result of tumor invasion of
the bone marrow, an indirect result of tumor therapy or systemic symptomatology, or an
"incidental" finding resulting from other pathology in the patient.1,2
In many cancer cases, anemia may cause the presenting symptoms, and hematologic
abnormalities can contribute to the overall morbidity of the tumor. Identification of the
pertinent clinical and laboratory abnormalities and correlation with bone marrow
histopathology are often essential in establishing an accurate diagnosis and in developing
an appropriate treatment plan.
Noninvasive Laboratory Evaluation
The initial evaluation of anemia in the cancer patient should be
noninvasive and should include pertinent findings from the peripheral blood smear, blood
chemistries, and some specialized tests. These should always include a complete blood
count (CBC), a peripheral blood smear examination, and a reticulocyte count. In most
institutions, reticulocyte counts are performed by flow cytometry and are reported as an
absolute or "corrected" reticulocyte count. (In the event that a percentage is
given, manual correction for the level of hemoglobin is necessary.) Additional testing may
include, but will not necessarily be limited to, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum
iron studies, direct antiglobulin test (DAT), or erythropoietin (EPO) levels.
Automated hematology results can be a key component in deciding the
direction in which an anemia workup should proceed. It is important to ascertain the
degree and number of cytopenias present (anemia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia) in
order to gauge the reticulocyte response (an elevated reticulocyte count suggests red cell
destruction with an intact bone marrow capable of responding to the anemia) and to
identify the red cell size (macrocytic anemias are frequently associated with marrow
failure, while microcytic anemias are most commonly associated with hemolysis or
abnormalities in iron metabolism).
Evaluation of the peripheral blood film by a trained individual will
further aid in delineating the most probable causes for the anemia and will indicate the
need for additional or ancillary laboratory testing. Specific red cell abnormalities, when
present, can suggest a mechanism for red cell destruction (schistocytes and red cell
fragments in microangiopathy, and spherocytes in autoimmune red cell hemolysis). Target
cells and burr cells are frequently found in metabolic disorders (liver and renal
disease), and teardrop cells may be seen in bone marrow and splenic infiltration by
malignant cells. Caution is needed, however, regarding these latter three abnormalities,
which are relatively less specific than the finding of true spherocytes and schistocytes
and can be observed in variable numbers in association with antibiotic therapy and
chemotherapy, as well as after splenectomy. The presence of nucleated red cells and/or
immature myeloid cells may suggest bone marrow infiltration (leukoerythroblastosis) or a
primary hematologic disorder such as myelodysplasia or a chronic myeloproliferative
disorder. Rouleaux and red cell agglutination may suggest a diagnosis of multiple myeloma
or the presence of cold agglutinins.
Frequently performed and helpful ancillary studies include flow
cytometry for immunophenotyping or DNA ploidy analysis, immunohistochemistry (some
antigens do not survive processing conditions well), molecular diagnostics (including
polymerase chain reaction, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and Southern blot
analysis), and cytogenetics.
Bone Marrow Evaluation
Direct evaluation of the bone marrow can be of value when the cause
of the cytopenias is suspected to be marrow failure, either secondary to infiltration by
tumor or as a result of antitumor therapy, or when definitive diagnosis requires tissue to
be obtained for cytology or special studies. These findings can yield a multitude of
morphologic or cytologic abnormalities related to causative mechanisms for hematologic
compromise (Table 1). However, specific morphologic findings may be more visible on one or
the other of these specimens (Table 2), and it is important to understand the
contributions and limitations of each. Cytology is better visualized on well-stained
Wright-Giemsa smears, and anatomic abnormalities or disorders associated with fibrosis are
best identified on thinly cut, well-fixed decalcified core biopsy sections.3
While techniques may be available in specialized institutions to handle core biopsy
specimens, most ancillary studies will require additional anticoagulated marrow aspirate.
In general, cell yield and viability also will be improved when aspirate is submitted.
Table 1. -- Bone
Marrow Findings Directly Related to a Diagnosis of Anemia |
| Cellularity and distribution |
| Absolute numbers of hematopoietic precursors |
| Iron-deficient, megaloblastic, or sideroblastic erythropoiesis |
| Hemophagocytosis |
| Fibrosis, necrosis, and marrow damage |
| Evidence of infection (parvovirus or granulomas) |
| Presence of malignant cells (metastatic or primary hematopoietic) |
Table 2. -- Contributions of Aspirate Smears and Core Biopsies to Diagnosis in the Anemic
Cancer Patient |
| Abnormalities best visualized on aspirate smears: |
| - Iron (amount and distribution) |
| - Dysplasia and abnormal maturation |
| - Specific hematologic diagnoses |
| |
- Acute leukemia and lymphoblastic lymphoma |
| |
- Chronic lymphoid leukemias (CLL, hairy cell leukemia, LGL leukemia) |
| |
- Small lymphocytic lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma |
| Abnormalities best visualized on core biopsies: |
| - Metastatic carcinoma and involvement by most lymphomas |
| - Fibrosis and necrosis |
| - Cellularity |
| - Specific diagnoses |
| |
- Granulomas |
| |
- Multiple myeloma |
| |
- Histiocyte/macrophage abnormalities |
Cytopenias as a Direct Result of the Malignancy
Malignant tumors, especially hematopoietic malignancies, can be the
primary cause of one or more cytopenias. In patients with myelodysplasia, an abnormal
clone of hematopoietic stem cells replaces normal hematopoiesis in the bone marrow. This
clone has frequent alterations in karyotype, with deletions, additions, and translocations
of multiple chromosomes. These chromosomal aberrations are associated with abnormalities
in both cellular cytology and function, often producing dyspoietic marrow precursors with
decreased maturational ability and diminished survival. The resultant cytopenias can be
severe and are often trilineal. The anemia that is present is usually macrocytic and
associated with a reticulocytopenia and clonal erythropoiesis. While the diagnosis is
often suspected after examination of the peripheral smear, confirmation requires
evaluation of bone marrow aspirate smears and biopsy sections.
Other hematopoietic neoplasms can also directly cause anemia by
suppression of the normal bone marrow. Acute leukemia, regardless of whether it produces a
hypercellular or hypocellular infiltrate, directly suppresses normal erythropoiesis and
causes an anemia of marrow failure. As in the myelodysplasias, anemia caused by acute
leukemia is also frequently macrocytic and associated with a decreased reticulocyte count.
Occasionally, marrow failure can be the result of marrow replacement by
tumor. This mechanism of anemia is most often associated with stage IV non-Hodgkins
lymphoma or metastatic carcinomas in adults (Fig 1). Chronic myeloproliferative disorders
with myelofibrosis can also present with a similar picture of marrow replacement, although
the mechanism of anemia in myelofibrosis is probably more related to the concomitant
splenomegaly.4 Supporting this hypothesis is the evidence that, even in
patients with profound hypocellularity and dense collagen fibrosis, splenectomy can
greatly improve the cytopenias. Other splenic malignancies, primarily splenic lymphomas,
can cause anemia by a similar mechanism of hypersplenism.
Cytopenias Indirectly Resulting From the Malignancy
While infiltration of the bone marrow is the central mechanism
leading to anemia in some cancer patients, it is predominantly associated with the
hematopoietic malignancies. The majority of anemic cancer patients will present with
cytopenias arising as an indirect result of the tumor. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA)
has been described in association with a number of tumors, although it is most frequently
noted in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.5 In a recent study of 130
patients with cancer and AIHA,6 the associated tumors included: chronic
lymphocytic leukemia (79), non-Hodgkins lymphoma (13), Hodgkins disease (12),
carcinoma (10), multiple myeloma (5), Waldenströms macroglobulinemia (4), acute
myelogenous leukemia (3), angioimmunoblastic lymphadenopathy with dysproteinemia (2),
acute lymphoblastic leukemia (1), and myelodysplasia (1). Warm-reacting antibodies are
more common than cold agglutinins. The characteristic spherocytic anemia is associated
with bone marrow erythroid hyperplasia, variable nuclear dysmorphism, and a
reticulocytosis.
Another anemia related to red cell destruction in patients with
cancer is characterized by microangiopathy. Most cases of cancer-associated
microangiopathic hemolytic anemia are seen in patients with known tumors, although
occasionally, this anemia may be the presenting feature of the tumor. Gastric carcinoma is
the most frequent coexisting cancer (52% of cases), followed by breast cancer (13%), and
lung cancer (10%).7 The syndromes identified are frequently resistant to
traditional therapeutic interventions and show considerable overlap with classic cases of
disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura (TTP),
and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS). The peripheral blood contains variable numbers of
true schistocytes associated with nucleated red cells and a reticulocytosis. Bone marrow
examination reveals a picture identical to that seen in patients with autoimmune hemolytic
anemia.
Cancer patients frequently have some degree of immunosuppression,
either transiently related to chemotherapy, or more long-term and related to the primary
immunosuppressive properties of their tumors. Like other immunocompromised individuals,
these patients can develop opportunistic infections or can show unusual manifestations of
otherwise common infectious diseases. The infections themselves can produce bone marrow
suppression and anemia. Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral medications are
contributors to this process. One specific infectious agent, parvovirus B19, can produce a
syndrome of pure red cell aplasia with a severe anemia. Although ubiquitous in the
population, immunosuppressed patients, including those with malignancies, can develop a
protracted infection with this virus.8,9 In a recent study of serologically
confirmed parvovirus B19 associated pure red cell aplasia,10 patients with both
myelodysplasia and lymphoma were identified. Characteristic bone marrow findings include
the presence of giant pronormoblasts showing both intranuclear and often cytoplasmic viral
inclusions, as well as a profound erythroid hypoplasia with an apparent erythroid
maturation arrest. Other cell lineages frequently appear normal.
One of the more common anemias noted in patients with cancer is
characterized by a normal red cell size, a low reticulocyte count, and an apparent
increase in bone marrow iron storage. This process has been called the "anemia of
chronic disease" and is associated with the elaboration of inflammatory cytokines in
the host. When anemia of chronic disease is seen in cancer patients, a wide variety of
marrow histologies can be seen. Frequently, the marrow is normocellular, with a normal M:E
ratio and an increase in histiocyte storage iron (Figs 2A-B). However, variable degrees of
myeloid hypoplasia may result in an overall marrow hypocellularity and a decrease in the
M:E ratio. Occasionally, erythroid hyperplasia is present. Dyspoiesis, when identified, is
generally minimal. These abnormalities may be identified even in the absence of tumor
invasion of the bone marrow and may reflect a systemic response to the presence of the
malignancy.
In addition to the processes initiated by the presence of tumor in
the patient, iatrogenic causes of anemia should be considered. As already mentioned,
antibiotics and other medications may cause marrow suppression or red cell destruction.
Chemotherapeutic agents, as well as radiation therapy, may cause direct marrow damage and
resultant cytopenias. This damage is usually transient, and the degree of marrow toxicity
is related both to the drug dose and specific drug type. Chemotherapeutic agents have
variable myelotoxic profiles and are administered frequently in combinations. On
examination of the peripheral blood smear, it is not possible to distinguish the
drug-induced effect from cancer-related causes of marrow compromise. Bone marrow biopsies
of chemotherapy patients show variable serofibrinous damage, occasional hemorrhage, and
drop-out of hematopoietic precursors. Shortly after the initiation of chemotherapy,
apoptotic cells are numerous. High-dose chemotherapy is associated with more stromalldamage and more serofibrinous exudate than conventional therapy
for solid tumors or lymphoma.
Cytopenias That Are Incidental to the Malignancy
Although the appearance of anemia or other cytopenia in patients
with known malignancies is most frequently related to the tumor or its therapy, other
causes are occasionally identified. Other hematologic malignancies, including the
development of a secondary myelodysplasia or acute leukemia, should be considered when a
patient develops cytopenia several years into treatment for a primary solid tumor or
lymphoma. Elderly patients may have more than one tumor, and marrow involvement by a
second cancer is a recognized phenomenon. Undiagnosed hemoglobinopathies, particularly
beta thalassemia trait, may confuse the clinician who is seeing a patient for the first
time. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or infection with human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) can produce anemia. This infection can be pre-existing and related to the
development of the patients malignancy, or it can occur during the course of therapy
as either transfusion-related or associated with other risk factors. Bone marrow
evaluation in patients with HIV infections show nonspecific findings, although some degree
of marrow suppression, plasmacytosis, and an associated "anemia of chronic
disease" is frequently found.11
Conclusions
Cancer can have a major impact on bone marrow function. Anemia in
these patients is frequently multifactorial, and arriving at a single diagnosis can be
difficult. It is important to have some understanding of the most probable mechanisms
operating in any given patient before rational therapy can be initiated. Directed
laboratory evaluation and examination of the bone marrow can provide important diagnostic
clues in many cases.
References
1. Spivak JL. Cancer-related anemia: its causes and characteristics. Semin Oncol.
1994;21(2 suppl 3):3-8.
2. Henry DH. Recombinant human erythropoietin treatment of anemic cancer patients. Cancer
Pract. 1996;4:180-184.
3. Hyun BH, Stevenson AJ, Hanau CA. Fundamentals of bone marrow examination. Hematol
Oncol Clin. 1994;8:651-663.
4. Bowdler AJ. Splenomegaly and hypersplenism. Clin Haematol. 1983;12:467-488.
5. Foucar K. B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and prolymphocytic leukemia. In:
Knowles DM, ed. Neoplastic Hematopathology. Baltimore, Md: Williams and Wilkins;
1992:1195.
6. Engelfriet CP, Overbeeke MAM, von dem Borne AEG. Autoimmune hemolytic anemia. Semin
Hematol. 1992;29:3-12.
7. Lin YC, Chang HK, Sun CF, et al. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia as an initial
presentation of metastatic cancer of unknown primary origin. South Med J.
1995;88:683-687.
8. Leads from the MMWR: risks associated with human parvovirus B19 infection Pt 1. JAMA.
1989;261:1406-1408.
9. Leads from the MMWR: risks associated with human parvovirus B19 infection Pt 2. JAMA.
1989;261:1555-1556.
10. Frickhofen N, Chen ZJ, Young NS, et al. Parvovirus B19 as a cause of acquired
chronic pure red cell aplasia. Br J Haematol. 1994;87:818-824.
11. Hambleton J. Hematologic complications of HIV infection. Oncology.
1996;10:671-680.
DR BENNETT
Do you think plastic sections represent an improvement over typical
paraffin-embedded material? Is it worth recommending a switch to plastic embedding to have
thinner sections and to fine-tune morphology?
DR MOSCINSKI
When I was a resident, we did all plastic sections, and they were
beautiful. Much immunohistochemistry and even some cytochemistries could be done directly
on plastic sections. Unfortunately, it takes extra time. In this era, we are trying to
come up with faster diagnoses and more efficient ways of dealing with things, so
plastic-embedding is probably not a great idea.
DR SABA
Your slide of Hodgkins disease shows a bone marrow with iron
outside of the cell. What does this mean in terms of a mechanism of anemia?
DR MOSCINSKI
The mechanism relates to anemia of chronic disease, which is
multifactorial and is still being elucidated. My understanding is that the macrophages
themselves are unable to release iron. This is a cytokine-mediated event, so one expects
to see iron in the macrophage and not in the red cell precursors.
DR BENNETT
My experience is identical to Dr Moscinskis.
There is a disparity between chronic inflammatory diseases and diseases of malignancy,
with either very few sideroblasts, and those present having only occasional single grains
of ferritin and iron in them, stained by Prussian blue. I think it would be unusual to see
much excess iron in the macrophages and at the same time see sideroblast iron, except
perhaps in the myelodysplastic syndromes.
From the Pathology Service at H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute,
University of South Florida School of Medicine, Tampa, Fla (L.B.) and the University of
Mississippi School of Medicine and G. V. (Sonny) Montgomery VA Medical Center, Jackson,
Miss (C.L.H.).
Address reprint requests to Lynn C. Moscinski, MD, Laboratory
Hematology Service, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia
Dr, Tampa, FL 33612.
Back to Cancer Control
Journal Supplement Volume 5 Number 2